Tag: Employment Agreement

News
December 17, 2024
Starting January 2025, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will require construction industry employers to ensure that personal protective equipment (PPE) properly fits workers based on their unique body sizes and shapes. Announced on December 11, this update explicitly mandates that PPE—such as hard hats, gloves, safety harnesses, and protective footwear—is both appropriate for job hazards and fitted for effectiveness. The change is particularly significant as the industry sees a growing number of women in construction, highlighting long-standing challenges with PPE fit for diverse body types.
Resources
November 14, 2024
Employee classification in the tech industry is essential for defining legal rights, benefits, and work conditions, impacting both the workers and companies involved. The two primary classifications in the U.S. are "employees" and "independent contractors." Employees are typically entitled to benefits such as health insurance, minimum wage protections, paid leave, and unemployment benefits. Independent contractors, however, are typically exempt from these benefits, offering them more flexibility and autonomy over their work but without the security of traditional employee benefits.
News
October 1, 2024
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently filed its first lawsuit under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). The lawsuit claims that Wabash, a national manufacturing company, failed to accommodate an employee’s pregnancy-related limitations, even though the accommodations were comparable to those offered to non-pregnant workers with disabilities. This groundbreaking case highlights the importance of ensuring compliance with this new law, which went into effect in June 2023.
News
September 24, 2024
Luxury retailer Hermes secured a victory in federal district court. Sued in a class action for alleged violations of federal (and state) anti-trust law, a federal judge threw out the lawsuit after stating that the plaintiff had not shown how competition for Hermes’s luxury items was affected adversely because of its alleged misconduct.