Workplace Policies v. Constitutional Rights of Employees

  • Home
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • Workplace Policies v. Constitutional Rights of Employees

In a landmark decision, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has ruled on a case involving Home Depot’s ban on its employee, Antonio Morales, wearing a Black Lives Matter (“BLM”) apron at the Home Depot location where Morales worked in Brighton, Minnesota. The NLRB’s decision has sparked a renewed debate on the intersection of workplace policies and employees’ constitutional rights.

In 2021, Morales, who uses they/them pronouns, wore a BLM apron while on the job and was told not to return to work with the BLM apron, which caused Morales to quit their employment with Home Depot. Home Depot argued that the ban on such attire was part of its dress code policy, which prohibits employees from displaying any non-company-related symbols or messages on their uniforms. The company contended that the policy was intended to maintain a neutral and inclusive work environment.

After careful consideration of the arguments presented by both parties, the NLRB ruled in favor of Morales. The board stated that because Morales and other employees at the store had previously raised concerns about racial harassment and discrimination, wearing a BLM apron was a logical growth of those complaints and the BLM symbol accumulated meaning was relevant to working conditions at the store. Thus, the board held that Home Depot broke the law by forcing Morales to quit due to their advocacy for better working conditions, which is protected under the law.

In its decision, the NLRB ordered Home Depot to reinstate Morales as an employee, provide back pay to Morales, compensate Morales for any tax consequences, and stop prohibiting its employees from taking part in protected concerted activities.

The ruling is expected to have broader implications for other companies with similar dress code policies, as it sets a precedent for the protection of employees’ rights to express social and political beliefs in the workplace. The decision underscores the ongoing challenges faced by employers in navigating the delicate balance between maintaining a professional work environment and respecting employees’ constitutional rights.

If you need assistance to further understand how this impacts your business, please contact us at

This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice, nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between MNK Law and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material.